Please try the URL privacy information feature enabled by clicking the flashlight icon above. This will reveal two icons after each link the body of the digest. The shield takes you to a breakdown of Terms of Service for the site - however only a small number of sites are covered at the moment. The flashlight take you to an analysis of the various trackers etc. that the linked site delivers. Please let the website maintainer know if you find this useful or not. As a RISKS reader, you will probably not be surprised by what is revealed…
In 2012, two Super Puma helicopters with a total of 33 people on board were forced to ditch in the North Sea when both the primary and emergency main router lubrication systems failed. Everyone survived with only minor injuries. The main router lubrication system in both aircraft failed due to fatigue cracking in a critical part, and the pilots activated the emergency lubrication system, which sprays glycol into the rotor and gives the aircraft 30 minutes' safe flying time. However, on both helicopters a warning light illuminated indicating that this emergency system failed as well, forcing them to ditch immediately (per their procedures). It turns out that the emergency lubrication systems were working fine, but the switch that was supposed to detect its failure was wired incorrectly, meaning that the warning light would *always* illuminate shortly after the system's activation. The aircraft manufacturer made an early design change affecting the switch's pin assignments but, when it re-ordered the switches, it used the original specification by mistake. This was compounded by the fact that 'the emergency lubrication sub-systems were tested individually, [but] no test was carried out on the complete system during certification, either on a test rig or installed on a helicopter'. The full Air Accident Investigation Bureau report is available as a PDF: http://www.aaib.gov.uk/publications/formal_reports/2_2014_g_redw_g_chcn.cfm Ian Chard <email@example.com> http://rainbow.chard.org/
"Special Conditions" refers to the fact that certification rules haven't kept pace. The three network domains (aircraft control, operator information, and passenger entertainment) used to run on physically separate wires, primarily for historical reasons, but having obvious engineering benefits as well. In recent years, first the computers and now the networks have migrated to virtual machine separation on shared hardware, for the equally obvious space, weight, and power savings. The *Federal Register* rule published this week mentions interconnection between at least two of the three domains; I hope they paid close attention to UC Berkeley's "Experimental Security Analysis of a Modern Automobile" (2010). https://federalregister.gov/a/2014-13244 Source: "Special Conditions: The Boeing Company, Models 737-700, -700C, -800, -900ER, -7, -8, and -9 Series Airplanes; Airplane Electronic Systems Security Protection From Unauthorized External Access" [*Federal Register* vol. 79, no. 109, June 6, 2014, pp. 32640-32641]. Joe Loughry, Doctoral Student in the Department of Computer Science St Cross College, Oxford
*Forbes* via NNSquad http://www.forbes.com/sites/jaymcgregor/2014/06/11/feedly-and-evernote-go-down-as-attackers-demand-ransom/ "You may have noticed that you can't access the website or load any of your feeds via the app. Feedly explained in a short message two hours ago that the DDoS perpetrator is holding Feedly to ransom and asking for money to stop the attack, Feedly has refused to comply."
Spreadsheet programs should have the precision of their numbers (# of 000s) severely limited, so that economists, bankers and politicians who are responsible for decisions involving billions & trillions of dollars won't be able to use them to make such large mistakes. ;-) http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2014/05/23/you-shouldnt-use-a-spreadsheet-for-important-work-i-mean-it/ You shouldn't use a spreadsheet for important work (I mean it). I envy economists. Unlike computer scientists, they seem to be able to publish best-seller books with innovative research. One such book is Pikettys Capital. The book is reminiscent of Marxs capital in its scope. If you haven't heard about the book yet, it has a simple message: the yield on capital is higher than wage growth, which means that those with the capital are bound to get richer and more powerful. The bulk of the population is doomed. A small elite will soon collect all the wealth, leaving none for the regular folks.
Serdar Yegulalp | InfoWorld, 27 May 2014 Microsoft isn't amused by new hack that tricks Microsoft Update into applying XP security patches http://www.infoworld.com/t/microsoft-windows/unofficial-xp-update-has-microsoft-in-arms-243183 Well, turnabout is fair play I suppose. I am not amused with Microsoft dropping of support. This post was typed on my Windows XP system. The more Microsoft keeps pushing against XP, the more likely my next OS will not be a Microsoft OS.
Loek Essers, InfoWorld Home, 27 May 2014 Hackers are demanding ransoms to unlock devices that were locked with the Find My iPhone tool, according to forum posts http://www.infoworld.com/d/mobile-technology/apple-devices-held-hostage-using-find-my-iphone-243133
David Shamah, With New Hack, Cellphone Can Get Data Out of Computers, *Times of Israel* 9 Jun 2014, http://www.timesofisrael.com/with-new-hack-cellphone-can-get-data-out-of-computers/ Professor Yuval Elovici, head of Ben Gurion University's Cyber Security Lab, has demonstrated software that allows a cell phone to spy on the activities of a nearby computer even though there is no connection between the phone and the computer. Unlike some "malware crosses air gap, time to panic" stories, this one actually seems plausible, although there's not enough detail in the press to understand what's actually happening. It is true, however, that computers generate potentially analyzable radio noise and that cell phones incorporate increasingly software-defined (i.e., re-programmable) radios. The article implies that the demonstration used software both on the phone and on the computer. That makes the job vastly simpler, of course, because it means the software (which the article plausibly says used the video hardware) can generate exactly the right "noise" for the receiver. Could a normal cellphone have its radio re-programmed to receive and analyze _unintentional_ signals? Are the radios sophisticated enough to enable that sort of analysis? Are cellphone antennas good enough? This sort of attack is usually portrayed as being performed from a van in the parking lot with a big antenna and lots of equipment--but a phone could plausibly be 6 feet away instead of 60, and could get away with much less antenna. The diversity of (undocumented) radio hardware makes a universal attack seem unlikely, but still... It's an interesting report. Clearly, there's potential for a customized mobile device to do this. And that customization might consist of new radio firmware in a shiny new iPhone.
Tap-and-go credit cards contributing to increase in crime stats, Victoria [Australia] Police say Chief Commissioner Ken Lay said the number of deceptions, including when thieves fraudulently use other people's credit cards, has increased by 11,600 and impacted on overall crime rates. “One of the main drivers over the last little while have been deceptions and these tap-and-go (credit) cards.'' The figures compare the 12 months to March 2014 with those from the previous year.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2014/06/09/nsa-our-systems-are-so-complex-we-cant-stop-them-from-deleting-data-wanted-for-lawsuit/ The National Security Agency recently used a novel argument for not holding onto information it collects about users online activity: it's too complex. The agency is facing a slew of lawsuits over its surveillance programs, many launched after former NSA contractor Edward Snowden leaked information on the agency's efforts last year. One suit that pre-dates the Snowden leaks, Jewel v. NSA, challenges the constitutionality of programs that the suit allege collect information about American's telephone and Internet activities. In a hearing Friday, U.S. District for the Northern District of California Judge Jeffrey S. White reversed an emergency order he had issued earlier the same week barring the government from destroying data that the Electronic Frontier Foundation had asked be preserved for that case. The data is collected under Section 702 of the Amendments Act to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. ... <https://www.eff.org/document/order-re-evidence-preservation-0>
Xfinity is rolling out a new service where by default all of the home routers will become hotspots for other Xfinity customers. The claim is that it won't use up the bandwidth of the "host" provider because it's a separate bandwidth section. (Not sure I believe it, but that's what they say.) Xfinity says that all users will be authenticated before connecting. If you use your own router, then it doesn't get enabled. Pros: If you are one of their customers, you can get WiFi service in a lot more places (free). Cons: What happens if someone uses your WiFi hotspot to conduct a criminal act? Xfinity says that the "host" won't be liable. But that seems to me a legal question, not a policy question for Xfinity to decide. And if police monitor (for example) child porn coming through a router, will they be tech savvy enough to understand that "oh yeah, that's one of those Xfinity things, so we should believe the homeowner when they say 'not me'"? And of course the additional risk is that enabling this feature increases the attack surface within the router, since unknown people (even if they are Xfinity customers) are now inside your network. Since many people leave devices open on their home network (on the understanding that "it's behind the firewall"), a break in the router from the outside guests to the inside host could put a lot at risk. This could also increase the value of an Xfinity customer's username/password, since knowing that information now gives access to a nationwide WiFi network. Hopefully they're doing more authentication than just a password, but I doubt it. Lots of coverage, some of it pointing out the risks. For example: http://blog.seattlepi.com/techblog/2014/06/09/comcast-is-turning-your-xfinity-router-into-a-public-wi-fi-hotspot/#24139101=0
FYI—Houston, you have a problem. I had to check my calendar twice to make sure that it wasn't April 1st. Given the hackability of home routers in general, this sounds like perhaps the worst idea I've ever heard. And these Comcast people want to sell you *home security* services??? Among other things, Comcast will be able to track smartphones all over Houston as they move around from hotspot to hotspot. Comcast apparently envies NSA & ATT, and wants to get into the action. I especially liked the part about "people using the Internet via the hotspot won't slow down Internet access on the home network. Additional capacity is allotted to handle the bandwidth." So perhaps Comcast has been lying about that upstream bandwidth problem all along? On the other hand, ubiquitous wifi coverage of Houston may convince many people to "cut the cord" to their cellphone carrier & use wifi exclusively. Dwight Silverman's TechBlog, 9 Jun 2014 Comcast is turning your Xfinity router into a public Wi-Fi hotspot [Updated] Update: Comcast has turned on the first 50,000 residential hotspots. http://blog.seattlepi.com/techblog/2014/06/09/comcast-is-turning-your-xfinity-router-into-a-public-wi-fi-hotspot/ [Long blog item truncated for RISKS. PGN]
Molly Wood, *The New York Times*, 11 Jun 2014 The smart home is full of promise: Coffee makers that turn on when you wake up, garage doors that open when you come home, relaxing music that is controlled remotely and air-conditioners and thermostats that perfectly regulate the home and save you money, too. Promise is rarely reality, though. Smart-home automation is a tricky and chaotic corner of tech right now. Companies are rushing to join the fray, buoyed in part by the success of the Nest Learning Thermostat, and Google's $3.2 billion acquisition of Nest. For consumers, putting together a smart home remains mostly a do-it-yourself project. You choose your components, connect them to your home network and start living your connected life. Companies like Comcast, Verizon and AT&T offer monitoring systems, but they don't offer much flexibility. And installing a complete home automation and security system can cost tens of thousands of dollars. The trouble is that for anyone pursuing this as a D.I.Y. project, the more devices you bring home, the more separate apps you need to control them. Suddenly, convenience becomes cumbersome. ... http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/12/technology/personaltech/your-coffee-maker-garage-door-and-air-conditioner-all-controlled-by-one-device.html
http://www.infoworld.com/d/data-center/the-fccs-net-neutrality-plan-much-worse-it-looks-243027 Paul Venezia, InfoWorld, 27 May 2014 Under the new proposal, ISPs will be slower to upgrade their networks and will find it easier to exploit customers on both ends
Can a daring entrepreneur from Newton and his team of technologists upend the way we watch TV? Only if the Supreme Court doesn't quash their idea first. Scott Helman, *The Boston Globe*, 05 Jun 2014 DON'T CALL CHET KANOJIA A DISRUPTER. First, it's hackneyed. "You go around in [Silicon] Valley, every punk is running around saying, you know, 'Disrupt, disrupt, disrupt,' " he says. "It's like, 'Dude, you have no idea what you're talking about.' " Kanojia, a Newton entrepreneur who's trying to lead a TV revolution, does know what he's talking about. Which brings us to his second objection. Disruption, he says, is too often conflated with destruction, which is not his goal. He's not out to destroy TV networks or the cable industry, he insists. Just to make things better for viewers. "Something's gotta give," he says, citing continued increases in cable rates. "Otherwise you end up in a system where it's another mortgage payment." Indeed, doesn't the cable bill loom large in those late-night, kids-in-bed budget discussions at the kitchen table? You shell out a bundle, and the bundle only grows-the average bill for a pay TV subscription alone is on track to reach $123 a month next year and $200 by 2020, according to a 2012 projection from market research firm NPD Group. And yet you ask yourself: What am I paying for? How many of those channels do I actually watch? ... http://www.bostonglobe.com/magazine/2014/06/05/aereo-wants-revolution-supreme-court-will-let/xevtnDRJj9HzbCdVQM22XK/story.html
States Enacting New Privacy Laws; Congress Creates a Vacuum in the Field State legislators have been extraordinarily busy in the past 14 months enacting privacy protective legislation. During the same period, Congress did not pass any notable pro-privacy reforms. Federal proposals to ban use of credit reports in employment decisions, to limit employers' access to Facebook accounts, and to require notifications of leaks of personal information (data breaches) have not moved forward in four years. SL Cover2013 privacy journal has counted more than 60 important laws on privacy enacted by state legislators in the 12 months since publication of its 2013 Compilation of State and Federal Privacy Laws. The new laws are described and cited in the 2014 Supplement, available in hard copy or pdf email attachment for $16. The 2013 book with the supplement included is $40 (postage included) and the digital version is $28.50. The book and supplement describe each law, grouped by states and by categories, and include the legal citation of each state law. Facebook Passwords A total of 17 states, 12 of them in the past year, have passed laws restricting employers from demanding social-media passwords or access to personal sites belonging to applicants or employees. In recent months ten states have extended these protections to students in higher education. Louisiana, Michigan, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington State have extended this protection to students in high schools and secondary schools as well. Wisconsin includes landlords in the prohibition. Surveillance by Drones Lawmakers in blue and red states alike have turned their attention to regulating law enforcement's use of unmanned aircraft for surveillance (drones). New laws in nine states require the government to have court approval before using drones for surveillance or for capturing images. North Carolina and Virginia have enacted moratoria on drone use by the government, both expiring in mid-2015. Oregon requires state registration of all drones and bans their uses as weapons. Access to Metadata Montana is apparently the first state to limit government agencies from getting access to location information from telephone providers (metadata) unless there is consent, an emergency, a search warrant, or a report of a stolen device. Texas seems to be the first and only state to require by statute a court warrant for law enforcement to procure email content. The law is written in such a way as to authorize access to email as much as to restrict it. The statute claims that Texas authorities may seize email content outside of Texas. Ban-the-Box There has been a significant campaign throughout the U.S. to `ban-the-box'. That is the box found on many job applications asking whether Applicants have ever been arrested or convicted. Many applicants have said that checking the box virtually assures that an application will be ditched. Therefore, reformers have asked state legislators to enact ban-the-box laws. The laws require elimination of the inquiry, whether it is in writing or verbally, until an applicant has been determined to meet the minimum requirements for a position and moves to the second stage of consideration for a job, usually an interview. Hawaii passed the first ban-the-box law in the nation, in 1998. In the past 18 months, ten states have followed suit. Some laws cover government employment; others cover public and private employment. In addition, Georgia and Illinois have banned the box administratively since last October. North Carolina has a ban-the-box alternative affecting state licensing boards. Employers' Electronic Monitoring Connecticut and Delaware now prohibit electronic monitoring of employees without advance notice. California legislators continue to occupy themselves with advancing the pro-privacy laws in their state. In the past 12 months, they required Web sites to notify the public that they are forbidden from using personal data about minors in marketing. Kids have rights to remove some data about themselves from Web sites. Smart-Grid Restrictions Utilities in California are restricted in secondary uses of customer data in so-called smart grid technology, which allows precise pricing based on usage. This is the first such law in the nation. Californians now have rights to have Web sites disclose how they respond to do not track signals and whether third parties collect marketing data from the principal Web site or app. The legislature extended the state's medical confidentiality protections to apps. And it toughened the anti-paparazzi law, now making it a crime to harass a child because of the parent's employment. Robert Ellis Smith, firstname.lastname@example.org, Publisher, PRIVACY JOURNAL, PO Box 28577, Providence RI 02908, 401/274-7861 fax 401/274-7861 www.privacyjournal.net
An international analysis of the impact of the Snowden disclosures, which I've edited, is now published. It covers developments in 29 countries. I just wish we had time to produce something more comprehensive, but the project only had four weeks from inception. I've blogged about it at http://www.privacysurgeon.org/blog/incision/global-security-analysis-reveals-widespread-government-apathy-following-snowden-disclosures/ but at this point I haven't put the report online, it's just a downloadable pdf. I've turned the report's conclusions by degrees from an apocalyptic scenario, highlighting a litany of deception and denial by government, into a somewhat more optimistic message of gradual change leading to reform. The two messages are not incompatible. [Slightly PGN-ed for RISKS.]
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140609/07284327524/no-computer-did-not-pass-turing-test-first-time-everyone-should-know-better.shtml No, A 'Supercomputer' Did *not* pass the Turing test for the first time, and everyone should know better So, this weekend's news in the tech world was flooded with a "story" about how a "chatbot" passed the Turing Test for "the first time," with lots of publications buying every point in the story and talking about what a big deal it was. Except, almost everything about the story is bogus and a bunch of gullible reporters ran with it, because that's what they do. First, here's the press release from the University of Reading, which should have set off all sorts of alarm bells for any reporter. Here are some quotes, almost all of which are misleading or bogus: [..] [Note: This story was bogus from the get-go. I ran it with the expectation that it would be debunked, so I am delighted to run this item and the following ones. PGN]
The news item about the Turing Test is yet another over-hyped stunt from Kevin Warwick, who has an impressive track record of getting the media to credulously repeat his inflated claims. A couple of good debunkings include: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140609/07284327524/no-computer-did-not-pass-turing-test-first-time-everyone-should-know-better.shtml http://www.kurzweilai.net/response-by-ray-kurzweil-to-the-announcement-of-chatbot-eugene-goostman-passing-the-turing-test f.anthony.n.finch <email@example.com> http://dotat.at/
It's not clear to me what the risks are in "Eugene Goostman" convincing someone the software is a 13-year old boy. Do we now envisage some sort of smart war-dialing virtual kid con artist fleecing people? Or do we envisage smart software being given too much responsibility such as chat-bot suicide counseling or such? Or is the risk that real chatting support people are more likely to be assumed to be bots? In the Most Human Human, Brian Christian muses that as a human control in the above competition, he could answer questions in such a way as to be perceived as being a machine. This has happened to me via email when I replied too quickly with a fairly bland email to customers reporting problems at my company. Is the risk in this case that end-users refuse help from perceived bots? I have found studies reporting people sometimes much more or much less likely to surrender personal information to automated (online) versus human moderated paper surveys. I am guessing the online ones are trusted a lot less these days, but my point is that people may now surrender more personal information to bots they think are people.
Re: German Green Energy, also Car 'Dash Cams (Drewe, RISKS-27.94) "(a) Wind and solar sources can provide significant power, but only in short bursts and not necessarily when needed, so either conventional generating plant will have to be retained with these sources feeding in as and when available, or renewables will have to generate something like 500% of the country's electricity, with the surplus stored (how?) for periods of calm weather or when the sun don't shine (with a margin for the inefficiencies of the storage system)." Doing a web search on history of pumped storage hydroelectricity turns up hits such as people.duke.edu/~cy42/PHS.pdf en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumped-storage_hydroelectricity Electric Utilities have been finding solutions to this problem as far back as 1890, when utilities used Steam Engines to generate electric power for distribution. Keeping boilers fired up at low use periods wasted fuel and overbuilding steam generation capacity for short term demand peaks wasted the capital needed to provide the generation capacity. The TVA pumped storage facility at Raccoon Mountain has a net dependable capacity of 1,652 megawatts and stores energy generated at coal fired and nuclear plants. Glacier retreat creates potential locations where pumped storage generators could be built without disrupting existing ecosystems any more than the meltdown of the glaciers already has. www.tva.gov/sites/raccoonmt.htm The same challenge of excess thermal power comes up 124 years later. Nuclear plants do not respond well to power levels being lowered and can take days to get back to full power if they are shut down abruptly. We were reminded of that by the Northeast transmission failure, August 2013 cip.management.dal.ca/publications/Ontario%20-%20US%20Power%20Outage%20-%20Impacts%20on%20Critical%20Infrastructure.pdf "Steamers" often have unused capacity at night. There is only so much that can be done in terms of finding night time clients for that excess capacity. Enron demonstrated how long it takes to reheat a "steamer" after letting it cool.
The TrueCrypt.com site apparently has a compromised set of binaries. The SourceForge TrueCrypt site has an advisory to switch to BitLocker. The published reports are unclear whether the sites have been hijacked, or whether this is a deliberate act on the part of the development team. This raises two risks: * The risk of relying on the availability of reliable distribution kits from online repositories. It emphasizes the need to burn local copies of installed software, lest the online repository be compromised or disappear. * How well regulated are online repositories routinely used by large communities of users. http://www.pcworld.com/article/2241300/truecrypt-now-encouraging-users-to-use-microsofts-bitlocker.html http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/05/28/truecrypt_hack/ Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com
>It is a regrettable truth that SSL certificates are a very expensive thing While I share your skepticism about the current security value of a signed cert, it's simply not true that they're expensive, and it hasn't been true for many years. Startcom (https://www.startssl.com/) will sign certs for free, $0.00, and all current browsers accept them. If that's not good enough, you can buy Comodo certs for $5/yr or Geotrust for $8/yr from resellers like ssls.com. [Jonathan Kamens had some similar comments. PGN]
In the UK we have (I think) *two* such power stations - effectively giant batteries. They were constructed to provide power surges to match peaks in demand—in the days of just three or four TV channels and no video recorders, the ad breaks would trigger huge surges in demand as maybe four or five million households would switch on their kettles in the space of 30 seconds. That was the time needed for these power stations to go from 0W to 500MW. The station I know of for certain is in Wales where they have a large reservoir at the top of a mountain. At night, when demand is low and just the baseload generators are running, cheap electricity is used to pump water from the reservoir at the bottom to the reservoir at the top. When demand peaks, these stations are ready to provide a quick surge of hydro-electric power. But these stations could just as easily be used to smooth out the supply in a nation of irregular green energy. Basic stats says that can predict roughly how much power you're going to get over the day (and year) and you can store surplus power and use it to smooth out the supply.
In RISKS-27.95, I saw the term "brute force attack" misused yet again. Selected plaintext seems more like the proper term for it. The password attacks actually observed tend to be using known password guessing followed by likely password guessing. And this is not the same as brute force - which essentially never works remotely against password systems with minor delays for retry and at least 8 characters of length. I think we should be more careful in our word usage. Fred Cohen - 925-454-0171 - All.Net & Affiliated Companies http://all.net/ PO Box 811 Pebble Beach, CA 93953
2014 LASER Workshop - Learning from Authoritative Security Experiment Results http://www.laser-workshop.org Arlington, Virginia - October 15-16, 2014 Paper submissions due June 30, 2014 [See earlier posting in RISKS-27.87. PGN]
Please report problems with the web pages to the maintainer