Oh, good grief (Seems to have been extensively debunked)
<P>Hmmm. The headline and the report mention "chemical weapons" a lot, but at no point do they mention any chemical weapons being used. The stuff about phosphorus melting people but leaving clothes intact is rubbish - the hordes of dead people with intact clothes but blackened skin and damaged flesh, instead of showing characteristic phosphorous injuries, are more likely showing characteristic decomposition of bodies which have been lying around for a while.</P> <P><A href="http://dailyablution.blogs.com/the_daily_ablution/2005/11/ablution_exclus.html"><a href="http://dailyablution.blogs.com/the_daily_ablution/2005/11/ablution_exclus.html</A></P>">http://dailyablution.blogs.com/the_daily_ablution/2005/11/ablution_exclus.html</A></P></a>
Rob
More Democrat flak to steer things off course. No WMDs? I've heard (1st hand) of bunker installations over there which were flooded to prevent access and the Geiger counters just went crazy. No WMDs? Bullshit, they were there all right....