https://www.wired.com/2017/02/russians-engineer-brilliant-slot-machine-cheat-casinos-no-fix/ "At the same time, most casinos can't afford to invest in the newest slot machines, whose PRNGs use encryption to protect mathematical secrets". These folks did what others have done in the past—bought one of the machines and reverse engineered it. In this case the PRNG. Also see Two-armed Bandits, 7 Feb 2017 (thanks to Tom Lambert) This item also has an interesting sequence of following comments. http://www.metafilter.com/164983/Two-armed-Bandits ...the operatives use their phones to record about two dozen spins on a [slot machine] they aim to cheat. They upload that footage to a technical staff in St. Petersburg, who analyze the video and calculate the machine's pattern based on what they know about the model's pseudorandom number generator. Finally, the St. Petersburg team transmits a list of timing markers to a custom app on the operative's phone; those markers cause the handset to vibrate roughly 0.25 seconds before the operative should press the spin button. No surprise to RISKS readers. The first interesting case of this kind that I reported was the Harrah's Tahoe $1.7 Million payoff internal fraud. This was a progressive payoff on 16 adjacent machines. The casino seems to have hidden this story, but it appears to have been an inserted Trojan horse chip. See the ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 8, 5, Oct 1983, pages 7-8. There are several other similar stories in our RISKS archives. PGN
Malcolm Owen, Apple Insider, 07 Feb 2017 A number of popular apps are vulnerable to a 'man-in-the-middle' attack due to poorly implemented TLS protection, an examination of apps in the iOS App Store has revealed, with a security researcher claiming it is possible to read data sent back to the app developer's servers for 76 apps. [...] http://appleinsider.com/articles/17/02/07/tls-vulnerability-in-popular-ios-apps-allows-user-data-to-be-intercepted-in-man-in-the-middle-attack This should be no surprise to those of you who read the best paper at the 2015 IEEE SSSP: Benjamin Beurdouche, Karthikeyan Bhargavan, Antoine Delignat-Lavaud, Cedric Fournet, Markulf Kohlweiss, Alfredo Pironti, Pierre-Yves Strub, and Jean Karim Zinzindohoue, A Messy State of the Union: Taming the Composite State Machines of TLS, Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, San Jose, CA, May 18-20, 2015. https://www.smacktls.com/smack.pdf As I probably noted once before, this paper analyzes the composition of client-side and server-side TLS implementations, and finds flaws (`unexpected behaviors') including the FREAK vulnerability, in popular TLS implementations, and in OpenSSL and JSSE. It is a remarkable paper, and well worth reading. PGN
Greg Barbosa. Medium.com, 6 Feb 2017 After scanning through the binary codes of applications in the iOS App Store, Will Strafach's verify.lyservice has detected that 76 popular apps in the store are currently vulnerable to data interception. The interception is possible regardless if App Store developers are using App Transport Security or not. A few months ago, similar vulnerabilities were discovered with Experian and myFICO Mobile's iOS apps. <https://medium.com/@chronic_9612/76-popular-apps-confirmed-vulnerable-to-silent-interception-of-tls-protected-data-2c9a2409dd1#.gyzqn7bef> <https://9to5mac.com/2016/10/12/psa-security-vulnerability-discovered-update-your-experian-and-myfico-mobile-ios-apps-asap/> https://9to5mac.com/2017/02/06/popular-apps-with-18000000-combined-downloads-in-the-app-store-found-vulnerable-to-silent-data-interception/
The developers have misconfigured the apps to accept invalid TLS certificates, says the security researcher who detected the app vulnerabilities Michael Kan, InfoWorld, 7 Feb, 2017 http://www.infoworld.com/article/3166349/application-security/dozens-of-ios-apps-fail-to-secure-users-data-researcher-says.html selected text: Dozens of iOS apps that are supposed to be encrypting their users' data don't do it properly, according to a security researcher. The developers of the apps have accidentally misconfigured the networking-related code so it will accept an invalid Transport Layer Security (TLS) certificate, ... In all, the 76 apps have 18 million downloads, ...
Zack Whittaker for Zero Day, 1 Feb 2017 Hackers are likely exploiting the easy-to-find vulnerabilities, according to the security researcher who warned the Pentagon of the flaws months ago. <http://www.zdnet.com/article/pentagon-system-flaws-likely-under-attack-by-foreign-hackers/> Several misconfigured servers run by the US Dept. of Defense could allow hackers easy access to internal government systems, a security researcher has warned. The vulnerable systems could allow hackers or foreign actors to launch cyberattacks through the department's systems to make it look as though it originated from US networks. Dan Tentler, founder of cybersecurity firm Phobos Group, who discovered the vulnerable hosts, warned that the flaws are so easy to find that he believes he was probably not the first person to find them. "It's very likely that these servers are being exploited in the wild," he told me on the phone. While the Pentagon is said to be aware of the vulnerable servers, it has yet to implement any fixes—more than eight months after the department was alerted. It's a unique case that casts doubts on the effectiveness of the Trump administration's anticipated executive order on cybersecurity, which aims to review all federal systems of security issues and vulnerabilities over a 60-day period. The draft order was leaked last week, but it was abruptly pulled minutes before it was expected to be signed on Tuesday. Tentler, a critic of the plans, argued that the draft plans are "just not feasible." "It's laughable that an order like this was drafted in the first place because it demonstrates a complete lack of understanding what the existing problems are," he said. "The order will effectively demand a vulnerability assessment on the entire government, and they want it in 60 days? Just that one vulnerability finding from me... it's been months—and they still haven't fixed it," he said. In the past year, the Pentagon became the first government department to ease up on computer hacking laws by allowing researchers to find and report bugs and flaws in systems in exchange for financial rewards. But security researchers like Tentler are still limited in how much they can poke around the military's public-facing systems. The department's official bug bounty governs the scope of what networks researchers can access. Researchers must limit their testing to two domains -- "defense.gov" and its subdomains, and any ".mil" subdomain. In an effort to pare down the list of hosts from "all public Department of Defense hosts" to "only the ones in scope," Tentler was able to identify several hosts which answered to the domain names in scope. "There were hosts that were discovered that had serious technical misconfiguration problems that could be easily abused by an attacker inside or outside of the country, who could want to implicate the US as culprits in hacking attacks if they so desire," he told me. "The flaw could allow politically motivated attacks that could implicate the US," he added. [...]
Lauren Pack, Staff Writer, *Journal News*, 27 Jan 2017 http://www.journal-news.com/news/data-from-man-pacemaker-led-arson-charges/sDp2XXGPY1EKJkY57sureP/ Investigators used the data from a Middletown man's pacemaker to help get an indictment in a fire that caused about $400,000 in damages. Ross Compton, 59, has been indicted on felony charges of aggravated arson and insurance fraud for allegedly starting the fire on Sept. 19 at his Court Donegal house. Police said Compton gave statements that were inconsistent with the evidence at the fire. Compton, who has extensive medical problems, including an artificial heart implant that uses an eternal pump, told police that when he saw the fire, he packed some belongings in a suitcase and bags. He told police that he then broke out the glass of his bedroom window with a cane and threw the bags and suitcase outside before taking them to his car. So police got a search warrant for all electronic data stored in Compton's cardiac pacing device, according to court records obtained by this news outlet. The data taken from Compton's pacemaker included his heart rate, pacer demand and cardiac rhythms prior to, during and after the fire. A cardiologist who reviewed that data determined “it is highly improbable Mr. Compton would have been able to collect, pack and remove the number of items from the house, exit his bedroom window and carry numerous large and heavy items to the front of his residence during the short period of time he has indicated due to his medical conditions,'' The fire caused about $400,000 in damages to the structure and contents of the 2,000-square-foot home on Court Donegal, according to Deputy Fire Chief Jeff Spaulding.
[Wow, $2.2 million penalty for spying on 11 million TVs. That's 20 cents per offense. That'll sure teach them and the industry not to trifle with peoples' information.] [And it's fives cents less than your two-bits worth of information.] Washington, DC—*Vizio*, a California-based manufacturer of Internet-connected "smart" televisions, has agreed to pay $2.2 million to settle charges by the *Federal Trade Commission* (FTC) and the New Jersey attorney general that it installed software on its TVs to collect viewing data on 11 million TVs without consumers' knowledge or consent. The payment includes $1.5 million to the FTC and $1 million to the *New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs*, with $300,000 of that amount suspended. The federal court order also requires Vizio to prominently disclose and obtain express consent for its data collection and sharing practices, and requires the company to delete data collected before March 1, 2016. According to the complaint, since Feb. 2014, Vizio and an affiliated company have manufactured smart TVs that capture second-by-second information about video displayed, including from cable, broadband, set-top box, DVD, over-the-air broadcasts and streaming devices. In addition, the agencies allege that the company added specific demographic information to the viewing data, such as sex, age, income, marital status, household size, education level, home ownership and household value, then sold this information to third parties. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2017/02/vizio-pay-22-million-ftc-state-new-jersey-settle-charges-it?utm_source=govdelivery <http://m1e.net/c?47971208-Tdr6Qet2PSyO.%40389127753-NtSVHrcuJWdCY>
> I'm reminded of a famous article Don Norman wrote in 1981 about how awful > the UNIX shell language (which at that time was the user interface) > was. One of the UNIX guys pointed out that commands he complained weren't > "natural" were because they weren't like the PDP-10 he was used to. That statement is cute, clever, and false (or maybe it is an alternative fact). Don Norman (that is, I) never said Unix Shell (and APIs) were bad because they were unfamiliar. I thought the underlying philosophy brilliant allowing people to string together lots of modules gto do powerful actions. I was a wizard at writing shell scripts. I said Unix was bad (actually, I said horrible) because of its lack of consistency. Argument handling and specifications were different from routine to routine. You had to keep looking up the syntax for all except the most frequently used calls in the manual, which kept getting larger and larger and larger. There were a zillion other examples of really unthoughtful design that not only had inconsistencies. There was also a distinct lack of interest in error checking, so that simple slips of the finger could lead to erasure of data, files, and entire directories (to remove all files starting with the word temp, say temp1, temp2,and temp3, simply type rm temp*. An accidental space character would transform that into rm temp * which would remove ALL files in that directory). Early text editors lost everything that had been done if the person quit the file without first saving it. ("Even experienced users have been known to lose their work" said the manual. Isues like these gave rise to the joke that "if it is documented, it isn't a bug, it is a feature.") There are lots of reasons for this, but I don't want to repeat my paper here. Let me simply say that after the initial shock of my paper wore off, the Unix creators came to agree with me and even became friends. Today's various flavors of Unix have overcome most of the problems. Alas, MacOS (and Windows) which runs on a Unix kernel, hides great power of Unix except to techies who can find the terminal program and pipe and redirect to their hearts content. The design rules that I started to develop in that paper in the 1980s are still true and important today. Consistency, feedback, good mappings, and a good conceptual model are the hallmark of good, useful design. Unix did have a powerful underlying conceptual model: it failed at the others. But hey, that was over 35 years ago! More facts: I never used a DEC (Digital) PDP-10, although I did use (and own) many every other DEC machine: PDP 1, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11 and Vax. I managed to skip the 10, which was replaced by the Vax. More importantly, it never occurred to me to contrast the Assembly language of these machines with Unix's shell script language. I fell in love with shell scripts: I never fell in love with assembly languages. Don Norman, Prof. and Director, DesignLab, UC San Diego email@example.com designlab.ucsd.edu/ www.jnd.org <http://www.jnd.org/>
Woody Leonhard, InfoWorld, 3 Feb 2017 Computers running fully patched Windows 10, 8.1, Server 2012, and 2016 are hit by Blue Screens when trying to connect to an infected server http://www.infoworld.com/article/3165231/microsoft-windows/vulnerability-in-microsoft-smbv3-protocol-crashes-windows-pcs.html opening text: Security experts warn that it may be possible to exploit a vulnerability in a protocol widely used to connect Windows clients and servers to inject and execute malicious code on Windows computers. Computers running fully patched Windows 10, 8.1, Server 2012, or 2016 that try to access an infected server will crash with a Blue Screen triggered in mrxsmb20.sys, according to a post by Günter Born on today's Born's Tech and Windows World blog.
Paul Krill, InfoWorld, 1 Feb 2017 Approximately six hours of data, including issues, merge requests, users, comments, and snippets, will be lost as GitLab restores from a backup http://www.infoworld.com/article/3163471/application-development/gitlab-database-goes-out-after-spam-attack.html opening text: Code-hosting site GitLab has suffered an outage after sustaining a "serious" incident on Tuesday with one of its databases that has required emergency maintenance. The company today said it lost six hours of database data, including issues, merge requests, users, comments, and snippets, for GitLab.com and was in the process restoring data from a backup. Data was accidentally deleted, according to a Twitter message.
*Adware is also on the rise, Cisco's Annual Cybersecurity Report says* *By Tim Greene Senior Editor, Network World* Spam is making a surprising resurgence as a threat to corporate security and becoming a more significant carrier of attacks as varied as spear phishing, ransomware and bots, according to Cisco's 2017 Annual Cybersecurity Report. The company's 10th such report says spam is way up. It accounts for 65% of all corporate email among customers who opted in to let the company gather data via telemetry in Cisco gear... ... Adware and other threats Another growing problem is adware, whose primary purpose is to display ads on Web pages or pop-ups to the benefit of advertisers. In the hands of malicious actors, though, they can carry malicious payloads that change settings in browsers and operating systems, undermine security products and even gain full control of the host. So rather than being an annoyance, adware is a threat. “Which means the focus is going to have to come onto adware from the corporate side to defend whereas historically it was more of a nuisance,'' Antes says. The report looked at adware in 130 organizations distributed across vertical industries for a year and found that 75% had adware infections... [snip] http://www.networkworld.com/article/3163250/security/cisco-spam-is-making-a-big-time-comeback.html
NNSquad https://techcrunch.com/2017/02/02/how-whatsapp-is-fighting-spam-after-its-encryption-rollout/?ncid=rss Rolling out end-to-end encryption raised not just political concerns, but practical ones. If WhatsApp couldn't read the contents of its users' messages anymore, how would it detect and fight spam on the platform? WhatsApp could have become a haven for scammers pushing pills and get-rich-quick schemes, which would have driven users off the platform and harmed its business even more than short-term court-ordered shutdowns.
Gregg Phillips, whose unsubstantiated claim that the election was marred by 3-million illegal votes was tweeted by the president, was listed on the rolls in Alabama, Texas and Mississippi, according to voting records and election officials in those states. He voted only in Alabama in November, records show. [AP 30 Jan2017] http://govnews.us/id/17148094264
I find it hard to believe there is no mechanical workaround for such locks. What happens when the power is off? Since hotel staff did not cut power to the affected rooms, does this means that in case of power cut the locks would stay in locked position? (Or maybe they just never thought of that).
The initial goal of DARPA when initiating the Ethernet was to establish a robust and secure network, so that communication to ICBMs could be maintained even in the event of a nuclear attack. Considering that this means that almost nothing but ICBMs was intended to be connected to the net, it seems we have made a full about-face...
I don't have the tools or the expertise to answer a question I've had for a long time. Perhaps you do. What percentage of browser exploits require the user to have active scripting enabled? Pretty much every serious threat I've read about requires it. If the percentage is as high as I think it is, I don't think my caution could reasonably be considered paranoia. It seems to me that running without active scripting can protect you against most zero-day exploits. I believe that the trade-off between privacy and functionality is something that we should each be weighing and deciding for ourselves. I've made my choice. I'm willing to believe that I'm mistaken about the choice of the average RISKS reader.
I have to respectfully disagree: it is just as hard to match nested if/elses on the indentation level as it is to match the braces. It may be somewhat easier if it all fits on one screen—as python scripts were originally intended to—but any half decent brace-based-language editor will highlight matching the brace, so not really even then. What you can't safely do is pretty-print python code. With braces there's any number of pretty-printers that will reformat your code so that indent matches the braces. With python I can't even manually reformat anything longer than a two screenfuls without messing up the un-indent somewhere down below. Or at least without being very very careful not to. And of course inserting a closing brace for scope that was never opened will generate a compiler error just like a wrong un-indent; what you can't do is un-indent past the left edge of the page, so there's that.
I like Python, but the fact that it uses indentation for grouping is one of the things I dislike, for two reasons. First it is easy to re-indent C or Perl code with braces, for instance with emacs (my text editor of choice). If there are spacing typos, they can easily be removed. This does not work with Python. If I refactor some code in Python, so it needs to re-indented this is a largely manual process. Not so with C or Perl. Second, I find it hard to visually line up different groups in a "large" piece of code. It has been my coding guideline for many years to have functions fit on a single screen (I saw a talk by Bjarne Stroustrup a little while ago where he mentioned this as well). Even following that guideline I sometimes find it hard to figure out the groupings with only indentation. This may well be, in part, due to my poor eyesight, but I still prefer the braces
> While it took a little while to get used to it, now I find the > python way works at least as well. Compilers remember the open > levels of indentation so they can diagnose spacing typos where you > return to an indentation level that was never opened, something C > and perl can't do since all braces look the same. > > It also avoids a whole category of hard to find bugs in C programs > where the indentation suggests one thing but the braces say > something else. To find the discrepancy, it is required to have redundancy. In languages with braces, there are two ways to encode the block structure, so GCC can notice the problem: Wmisleading-indentation warns about places where the indentation of the code gives a misleading idea of the block structure of the code to a human reader. For example, given CVE-2014-1266: sslKeyExchange.c: In function 'SSLVerifySignedServerKeyExchange': sslKeyExchange.c:629:3: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard... [-Wmisleading-indentation] if ((err = SSLHashSHA1.update(&hashCtx, &signedParams)) != 0) ^~ sslKeyExchange.c:631:5: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it is guarded by the 'if' goto fail; ^~~~
I'm a bit ambivalent myself. I've worked on this topic for about a dozen years now. I wish someone would take it seriously, but this article doesn't give any indication that anyone is. (Of course, that may simply be a reporter covering something he doesn't understand ...) I've posted a little bit on it recently: http://itsecurity.co.uk/2016/09/security-implications-quantum-computing/
[ reads like a prequel for "Quantum Cryptography *for Dummies*" ] [ worth reading, for those tracking the media coverage. ] [ needs some pruning, I'm afraid.] *Physicists, Lasers, and an Airplane: Taking Aim at Quantum Cryptography* <https://www.wired.com/2017/02/physicists-test-quantum-cryptography-playing-catch-photons-plane/> ( #cryptography #Hacking #quantum computing #quantum mechanics ) ...pivoted their telescope to catch the photons, one by one. On their best run, they caught over 800,000 photons in just a few minutes, but it wasn't easy. “Out of every 10,000 photons they sent, we'd get one,'' says Pugh, who studies at the University of Waterloo. “One to a hundred of them.'' The point of this high-altitude game was to test a technology known as quantum cryptography. For decades, experts have claimed that if executed properly, quantum cryptography will be more secure than any encryption technique used today. They also say it will be one of the lines of defense when quantum computers crack every existing algorithm. But it's hard to pull off; quantum cryptography requires precise control of individual photons over a long distance. Pugh's group was the first <https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.06396> to successfully test the technology from ground to airplane. It works like this: The sender transmits carefully prepared photons, over optical fiber or through the air, to a recipient. The recipient reads the photons like Morse code, with physical signals corresponding to a letter or a number. Instead of listening for long and short beeps, Pugh and his colleagues measured how the photons are oriented—what physicists call polarization. In their setup, photons could be polarized in four directions, and the team translated that polarization into 1's and 0's: a binary message known as a cryptographic key. Using that key, a sender can encrypt their information, and only a recipient with the key can unscramble the message. Quantum cryptography is so powerful because it's physically *impossible* for a hacker to steal a key encoded using quantum particles. In the quantum world, when you measure or observe a particle, you change it. It's like Schrodinger's cat, which is both dead and alive when you're not looking, but immediately becomes one or the other when you look. If you try to measure a quantum key, you immediately change it—and by design, the sender will know and throw the key out. “It's secure by the laws of nature,'' says physicist Thomas Jennewein, who led the work at the University of Waterloo. Commercial quantum cryptography products have been around for over 15 years, but they have limited range. “You can guarantee security between the White House and the Pentagon, or from the corner of one military base to another,'' says Caleb Christensen, the chief scientist at MagiQ Technologies, a Boston-area company that makes commercial quantum cryptography systems. “In the telecom business, that's way too short.'' So far people have been able to send quantum keys just 250 miles. This tech will be important when computers become too powerful for current encryption algorithms. It takes today's computers far longer than the age of the universe to decode an encrypted message, but it'll be a cinch for quantum computers. “It might take hours or days as opposed to age of the universe,'' says Pugh. Still, quantum cryptography won't be tech's security savior. Most hacks today are due to simple human error. “Most times when a corporation gets hacked, it's not necessarily because someone went in and spliced into their telephone line,'' says Christensen. “If you lose all your secrets because someone phishes the e-mail of your middle management, you're not going to spend millions of dollars installing a quantum cryptography backbone.'' For those with higher security standards, the eventual goal is to deliver quantum keys to a satellite, which could make it possible to send quantum-secured messages across the globe. Last August, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, collaborating with Austrian physicists, launched a satellite called Quantum Experiments at Space Scale, although they haven't successfully sent it a key. Jennewein's team has been rehearsing for a satellite mission for over three years. In 2013, they started by sending quantum keys to a moving truck. Now that they've shown they can transmit enough quantum signal through a mile of Earth's atmosphere, Jennewein wants to beam a key 300 miles into the air, to a satellite in low-Earth orbit. With proper funding, Jennewein thinks his team could do it in two or three years. He's optimistic: “The airplane experiment is, in some respects, harder than an actual satellite,'' he says. “A satellite has much smoother and more predictable motion than an aircraft.'' Just ask Pugh.
Please report problems with the web pages to the maintainer